By Graham Oppy
This booklet is a distinct contribution to the philosophy of faith. It bargains a entire dialogue of 1 of the main recognized arguments for the lifestyles of God: the ontological argument. the writer offers and analyzes a serious taxonomy of these types of the argument which have been complex in fresh philosophical literature, in addition to of these traditionally very important models present in the paintings of St. Anselm, Descartes, Leibniz, Hegel and others.
Read or Download Ontological Arguments and Belief in God PDF
Best logic & language books
The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein
Ludwig Wittgenstein is likely one of the most crucial and influential philosophers of the 20 th century, yet he's additionally one of many least available. This quantity presents a understandable consultant to his paintings through a variety of specialists who're actively engaged in new paintings on Wittgenstein. The essays, that are either expository and unique, handle critical issues in his philosophy of brain, language, good judgment, and arithmetic and make clear the connections one of the diversified levels within the improvement of his paintings.
Marxism and the Philosophy of Language
Volosinov's vital paintings, first released in Russian in 1929, needed to wait a iteration for popularity. this primary paperback variation of the English translation can be capital for literary theorists, philosophers, linguists, psychologists, etc. Volosinov is out to undo the outdated disciplinary barriers among linguistics, rhetoric, and poetics with a view to build a brand new form of box: semiotics or textual concept.
A Study of Kant's Psychology With Reference to the Critical Philosophy
So much reviews of the serious philosophy continue traditionally, logically, or metaphysically. They hint the exterior impacts upon it, and its improvement inK ants brain; or, they inquire into its consistencies and attempt its energy from its personal rules; or, taking it as truth-expressing, they seek its metaphysical validity.
Diccionario de Logica y Filosofia de la Ciencia
Publication via Mosterin, Jesus, Torretti, Roberto
- Prolegomena to a science of reasoning : phaneroscopy, semeiotic, logic
- Modalities and Multimodalities
- George Campbell: Rhetoric in the Age of Enlightenment
- Divine Motivation Theory
Additional resources for Ontological Arguments and Belief in God
Sample text
It is not clear how these expressions are best understood, and many modern commentators have chosen to translate them into a more favored idiom - and, in particular, the idiom of 'logical possibility'. I suggest that there are three promising candidates for arguments that can be constructed as interpretations of St. Anselm's argument. First, there are those arguments that I call 'modal ontological arguments involving actuality': These arguments result from the interpretation of 'existence in the understanding' and 'that which can be conceived' as 'that which 11 But cf.
Anselm and/or that have been discussed in connection with this argument. Among these principles are the following: 1a. Any being that exists in reality is greater than every being that exists only in the understanding, lb. , 1-6. Ontological arguments and belief in God IC. 2a. 2b. 3a. 3b. 3c. 4a. 4b. 4c. 5a. 5b. 5c. in reality is greater than every being that exists only in the understanding. Any being that exists in reality is greater than every being of kind K that exists only in the understanding.
There are three main characters who participate in the dialogues: Philo, Cleanthes, and Demea; and there is also a narrator - Pamphilus - who introduces the dialogues and also provides an evaluation of the upshot of the discussion. Very roughly (i) Cleanthes is a representative of the main currents of eighteenth-century natural theology, that is, a defender of teleological arguments for the existence of God; (ii) Demea is a representative of both orthodox rationalism, that is a defender of ontological and cosmological arguments for the existence 26 Perhaps Leibniz supposed that impossibility is finitely demonstrable inconsistency.